2019獨(dú)角獸企業(yè)重金招聘Python工程師標(biāo)準(zhǔn)>>>

Author: Sangram Gayal

This paper covers an internal incident that occurred at a small software development firm in India. The attacker - an employee of the firm, used a sophisticated two-step method to exploit an internal server and retain privileges on it.

The software company, though lacking a formal incident handling policy was able to handle the incident with the help of security consultants and proactive support from the management.

All the logs, signatures, and evidence presented in the paper have been obtained in a laboratory setup. The company is safeguarding all the original evidence for further investigations, if necessary.



The attacker used two exploits to gain control over the system. These are

openssl-too-open - Apache SSL key Arg buffer overflow [ref: 10]

myptrace.c - ptrace and kernel level vulnerability in Linux OS by Snooq http://www.angelfire.com/linux/snooq/ [ref: 1]

The openssl-too-open exploit has been documented by Chia Ling Lee for his GCIH practical assignment in support of "cyber defense initiative". The paper can be obtained at http://www.giac.org/practical/GCIH/Chia_Ling_Lee_GCIH.pdf [ref: 8]. This exploit has also been presented by Anton Chuvakin as a part of GCIH practical assignment and is available at http://www.giac.org/practical/GCIH/Anton_Chuvakin_GCIH.pdf [ref: 9]. I will not be discussing the openssl vulnerability in this paper, although I will give a gist of it in later section.

In this paper I concentrate on ptrace or Linux Kernel Privileged Process Hijacking vulnerability. The exploit is known as myptrace.c. This vulnerability is documented at various sources as

Name 1	CAN-2003-0127
URL	http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2003-0127
?	?
Name 2	Linux Kernel Privileged Process Hijacking Vulnerability
Reference	BID 7112
URL	http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7112

Parameter	Classification	Description
Class	Design error	Serious flaw exists in the function as it was not designed to handle certain conditions
Type	Local	The attacker needs to have some privileges o the system to exploit it
Functionality	Escalation of privileges	The attacker can escalate his privileges on the affected system

Linux kernel versions 2.2.x prior to 2.2.25 and 2.4.x prior to 2.4.20 are vulnerable to the exploit. The following list has been compiled from various sources such as Bugtraq [ref: 7], ISS Xforce [ref: 6], Securiteam Advisory [ref: 16], and CVE [ref: 5]

Affected systems

Linux kernel 2.2 Linux kernel 2.2.1 Linux kernel 2.2.2 Linux kernel 2.2.3 Linux kernel 2.2.4 Linux kernel 2.2.5 Linux kernel 2.2.6 Linux kernel 2.2.7 Linux kernel 2.2.8 Linux kernel 2.2.9 Linux kernel 2.2.10 Linux kernel 2.2.11 Linux kernel 2.2.12 Linux kernel 2.2.13 Linux kernel 2.2.14 Linux kernel 2.2.15 Linux kernel 2.2.16 Linux kernel 2.2.17 Linux kernel 2.2.18 Linux kernel 2.2.1 Linux kernel 2.2.20 Linux kernel 2.2.219 Linux kernel 2.2.22 Linux kernel 2.2.23 Linux kernel 2.2.24 Linux kernel 2.4 Linux kernel 2.4.1 Linux kernel 2.4.2 Linux kernel 2.4.3 Linux kernel 2.4.4 Linux kernel 2.4.5 Linux kernel 2.4.6 Linux kernel 2.4.7 Linux kernel 2.4.8 Linux kernel 2.4.9 Linux kernel 2.4.10 Linux kernel 2.4.11 Linux kernel 2.4.12 Linux kernel 2.4.13 Linux kernel 2.4.14 Linux kernel 2.4.15 Linux kernel 2.4.16 Linux kernel 2.4.17 Linux kernel 2.4.18 Linux kernel 2.4.19 Linux kernel 2.4.20 Linux kernel 2.4.21 pre 1

2.2.1 Affected Platforms

Cobalt CacheRaQ 4 Cobalt Qube 3 Cobalt RaQ 4 Cobalt RaQ 550 Cobalt RaQ XTR Conectiva Linux 6.0 Conectiva Linux 7.0 Conectiva Linux 8.0 Debian Linux 3.0 EnGarde Secure Linux Community Edition EnGarde Secure Linux Professional Edition Gentoo Linux Any version Linux Any version Mandrake Linux 7.2 Mandrake Linux 8.1 Mandrake Linux 8.2 Mandrake Linux 9.0 Mandrake Linux Corporate Server 2.1 Mandrake Single Network Firewall 7.2 Red Hat Linux 7.1 Red Hat Linux 7.2 Red Hat Linux 7.3 Red Hat Linux 7.x Red Hat Linux 8.0 Red Hat Linux 9.0 SuSE Linux 7.1 SuSE Linux 7.3 SuSE Linux 8.0 SuSE Linux 8.1 SuSE Linux Connectivity Server Any version SuSE Linux Database Server Any version SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 7 SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 8 SuSE Linux Firewall Any version SuSE Linux Office Server Any version SuSE eMail Server 3.1 SuSE eMail Server III Any version Sun Cobalt Control Station (SCCS) Any version Sun Linux 5.0 Trustix Secure Linux 1.01 Trustix Secure Linux 1.1 Trustix Secure Linux 1.2 Trustix Secure Linux 1.5

Though this exploit has been named myptrace.c, this vulnerability does not exist in ptrace program. The vulnerability lies in the Linux Kernel and is exploited using ptrace. Kernel is the core of any system and handles all the critical process including memory management and I/O functions. Hence vulnerability at the kernel level can be used to compromise the entire system irrespective of the applications.



The vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel. The ptrace program is used to attach to the root spawned process; this is usually the kernel child process. Using this vulnerability the root owned process can be debugged and controlled. Later malicious code (shell code) can be injected into the process and executed, so as to escalate the privileges of the user to root. The injected shell code is executed with privileges of setuid root. This gives the attacker a shell with root privileges. For detailed working of the exploit refer to the section "The Exploit - inner workings".



There are two variants of this exploit available in the void. The original exploit code was authored by Wojciech Purczynski cliph@isec.pl and is called ptrace-kmod.c. The second well-known code that exploits this vulnerability has been authored by Anszom anszom@v-lo.krakow.pl and is known as km3.c.

Code by Purczynski (ptrace-kmod.c) spawns a connect-back shell that the attacker can use. Anszom's and Snooq's code (myptrace.c) uses a method by which the shell code is bound to a fixed port number. Anszom's code binds to the port 4112 while Snooq's code binds to the port 24876.

Anszom's and Purczynski's code reads the /proc entries. The /proc directory is a virtual directory which maintains the process table. All the information regarding the state of process and privileges can be obtained by querying the process table. So if the permissions of /proc are set to chmod 700, theses exploits will not work. Snooq's myptrace.c does not read the /proc entries, hence the quick fix solution to alter the permissions of /proc will not be applicable and the system is still exploitable.

Author's homepage (Snooq)	http://www.angelfire.com/linux/snooq/
Exploit URLs	?
Bugtraq reference	http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7112/info/
ISS Xforce Advisory	http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/11553.php
Red Hat Security Advisory RHSA-2003:098-00	https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-098.html
Variants of the exploit	http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7112/exploit/
Patch information (general)	http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0303.2/0226.html

This section deals with the exact technique used by the exploit code to escalate privileges on a vulnerable system. The exploit code is also explained in detail. I have changed the program flow so as to facilitate understanding of the exploit code.





The myptrace.c exploit is a local root exploit. The user needs to have an account on the system to run this exploit. The system can be exploited only if

• The kernel is vulnerable (see "Operating systems affected" for a list of vulnerable kernels)
• Kernel has been compiled with the module support
• Kernel module loader is enabled on the system
• ptrace() calls are not blocked

Most of the default out of the box systems satisfy the above criteria and are vulnerable to the exploit.



The following steps broadly outline the working of the exploit.

The exploit requests a feature that exists in a kernel module.

The kernel spawns a child process with UID and GID 0 (root owned)

This kernel child process is attached to by ptrace (which actually is the vulnerability, the child process should not be allowed to be debugged)

Kernel child process executes the binary "modprobe" or "/sbin/modprobe"

This is the time when the exploit injects a malicious code into the memory area where modprobe is executing and overwrites the return pointer to execute the malicious code (shell code).

Since this is a local exploit, no protocol is involved. But to understand the working of this exploit some basic knowledge of system calls, ptrace() call and fork() call, and signals is required. I will explain these in very brief.





The kernel is the core of any operating system. It provides all the important functionality of any operating system. It is mainly responsible for file system management, memory management, I/O functions and scheduling.



An executable of binary file is called program and is executed by issuing the exec system call.



Any instance of a running program is known as a process. Every process is associated with various identifiers or IDs. Eg. PID is a unique Process ID, PPID is the parent PID, UID is the user ID and so on.



Any Unix system provides interfaces for any active process to access the services of the kernel. These interfaces or entry points are known as system calls. A system call to the C programmer appears similar to any other function.



Signal is an asynchronous notification of an event. A signal is generated or sent to a process, when an event associated with that process occurs. Whenever a process receives a signal it can take default action, ignore it or invoke a function depending upon the signal type and the interface provided.



The fork() system call is used by the Unix operating system to create a copy of an active process. The fork() system call when executed by a process a replica of the process is created. The process that executed the fork() call is known as the parent process and the new process that is created is the child process.



The ptrace function allows a parent process to control the execution of a child process. The ptrace() system call is used for debugging purposes to follow the execution of a program. It is mainly used for break point debugging. Once a process is being debugged by ptrace(), it can be controlled, single stepped and also registers can be written to, so as to modify the execution of that process.



This signal stops a process. The process can be continued by the signal SIGCONT.



This signal notifies the parent process, that the state of the child process has changed.



Here I will explain the main snippets of the exploit code that gives the core functionality. The code has been written in C and makes use of signals and UNIX system interfaces. For further reference on C programming and UNIX programming refer to "The C programming Language" [ref: 18], "UNIX programming Environment" [ref: 19] and "UNIX Network Programming" [ref: 17]. The complete exploit has been provided as an appendix. [ref. "myptrace.c exploit source code"]

1. Preliminary declaration for including header files necessary for working of the program and global variable declaration



2. Port binding shell code is declared as a character array. This is a shell code in hexadecimal that when executed will spawn a shell that will bind to the port 24876. This array can later be injected into memory location so that upon execution it will give us an interactive shell.



3. In main program the current program is forked. If the fork() call returns -1 the fork was unsuccessful, program will then exit printing an error message. The fork() call is executed once but returns twice; once in the parent and once in the child. If the fork is successful, the "parent" program is returned the child's PID by fork. While the fork() call in the child returns 0, so the process can know that it is the child process.hell.

Code for forking and start of main function



Here we make 3 cases

Case 1: fork() = -1; the fork was unsuccessful, program terminates.

Case 2: fork() = 0 ; this process is child process and this process will be used for attacking. The PID of this child process can be obtained by the system call getpid() from within the child process. This is stored (termed) in variable "child".

Case 3: fork() =?; if the fork returns any thing other than -1 or 0, the current process is probably in the parent process and the fork has returned the PID of the child. So it takes the default action. The default action can be taken only by the parent program and calls a function in the kernel module:

socket(AF_SECURITY,SOCK_STREAM,1)

This call makes the kernel spawn a child process. The PID of the kernel child process (termed as k_child) is guessed to be the exploit code child's PID +1

Code for case 3: default action in parent process



Code for case 1: error



Code for case 2: The child process



4. Now in the child process we try to bind to the child spawned by the kernel with PID child+1. For binding or controlling the kernel child process we need to ptrace it.



5. Once the program attaches ptrace() to the kernel child process, the kernel child process will get a SIGSTOP signal. The controlling program, that is child process of exploit program will get a SIGCHLD signal. So program waits for SIGCHLD signal to know if the ptrace() was successful.



6. Once the ptrace() is successful; control of the kernel child process is with the exploit process. Now the shell code is injected into the memory.



7. After injecting the shell code the exploit code detaches from the modprobe and then kills the main exploit program process and also the child process of the exploit.



8. Now there is a new port (24876) open on the system. All that the attacker has to do now is connect to port 24876 on the system to get root privileges.



The "myptrace.c" attack leaves no signature on IDS as it is a local root exploit. During the investigations and experimental laboratory simulation of the exploit, the system function call made by "myptrace.c" exploit was not found in the modules. This leaves a trail in the "/var/log messages". Though this is not the signature of the exploit, just in a particular scenario, if the kernel fails to find the module requested one might encounter the following kernel error message. This message may be generated in other genuine error circumstances too. So once again I assert that this is not the signature of the exploit but I am mentioning it here for record purposes only.





The following counter measures can be taken to protect against this exploit.

Apply vendor patch to the kernel. Since this is risky, "change management procedures" need to be followed. The current state of the system should be backed up along with all data and a "roll back" plan should be in place.

The other method is to upgrade the kernel to ver 2.5 on standby system and replacing it with the live system. Here too a roll back plan is important.

A quick fix solution to this problem is disabling kernel modules or installing a ptrace-blocking module.

A workaround is possible by setting /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe and /sbin/modprobe to point to any bogus file. However this will disable all the functionality offered by kernel modules

Here is a listing of available vendor patches for popular distributions of LINUX.

Red Hat Security Advisory and associated patch https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-098.html

Debian Security Advisory http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-270

MandrakeSoft Security Advisory and patch information http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKSA-2003:038

A generalized patch for custom-built system is also available. To use this patch, one would have manually patch using the diff file and recompile the kernel. http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0303.2/0226.html

轉(zhuǎn)載于:https://my.oschina.net/zhuzihasablog/blog/140802

總結(jié)

以上是生活随笔為你收集整理的Malware FAQ: How does the Ptrace exploit work o...的全部內(nèi)容，希望文章能夠幫你解決所遇到的問題。

如果覺得生活随笔網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容還不錯，歡迎將生活随笔推薦給好友。